THE
CONSTITUTION—THE
UNION—THE LAWS.
New Orleans Daily Crescent
November 13, 1860
| This
editorial was one of the first things added to the website, but it was
only a partial text, taken from Kenneth Stampp's Causes of the Civil War, pp.
46-47. (That original text is denoted here in a dark blue color.)
I should have taken advantage of resources like newspapers.com to
locate the full editorial, but Stampp typo-ed the date to November 18,
1860, so there was a bit of difficulty in finding the original
text. Once that problem was solved, well, here we are.
|
|
We
have abated not one jot or tittle of our attachment to the
“Constitution, the Union and the Enforcement of the Laws”—the proud and
unexceptionable motto of the party for which we battled during the long
and exciting contest so recently closed. We occupy the same
ground we have ever occupied. We have not changed in the
slightest particular. Let the Constitution be enforced in all its
integrity; let the laws of Congress, enacted in pursuance of its
authority, be scrupulously and faithfully carried out; let the
decisions of the supreme judicial tribunal of the land be respected and
vindicated in all portions of the Confederacy; let a true and loyal
obedience to the laws and the courts prevail everywhere in the North,
South, East and West—and the Union will be in no danger of disruption
from any cause, but will stand for ages an indestructible monument of
the surpassing wisdom of our ancestors and the unvarying fidelity and
patriotism of their descendants. The history of the Abolition or Black Republican party of the North is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of absolute tyranny over the slaveholding States. And all without the smallest warrant, excuse or justification. We have appealed to their generosity, justice and patriotism, but all without avail. From the beginning, we have only asked to be let alone in the enjoyment of our plain, inalienable rights, as explicitly guaranteed in our common organic law. We have never aggressed upon the North, nor sought to aggress upon then North. Yet every appeal and expostulation has only brought upon us renewed insults and augmented injuries. They have robbed us of our property, they have murdered our citizens while endeavoring to reclaim that property by lawful means, they have set at naught the decrees of the Supreme Court, they have invaded our States and killed our citizens, they have declared the unalterable determination to exclude us altogether from the Territories, they have nullified the laws of Congress, and finally they have capped the mighty pyramid of unfraternal enormities by electing Abraham Lincoln to the Chief Magistracy, on a platform and by a system which indicates nothing but the subjugation of the South and the complete ruin of her social, political and industrial institutions. All these statements are not only true,
but absolutely indisputable. The facts are well known and patent.
Under these circumstances, in view of the dark record of the
past, the threatening aspect of the present, and the very serious
contingencies which the future holds forth, we submit and appeal
to a candid and honorable world, whether the Southern people have
not been astonishingly patient under gross provocation -- whether
they have not exhibited remarkable forbearance -- whether they
have not been long suffering, slow to anger and magnanimous, on
numerous occasions where indignation was natural, and severe
measures of retaliation justifiable? There can be no doubt on
this point. For the sake of peace, for the sake of harmony, the
South has compromised until she can compromise no farther,
without she is willing to compromise away character, political
equality, social and individual interest, and every right and
franchise which freemen hold dear.
All the Northern States, with the exception of New Jersey, voted for Lincoln. As he is fully as odious to the South and just as dangerous to her institutions as William H. Seward would have been, the fact of his election, by an overwhelming majority, is full of portentous significance. It shows, beyond all question or peradventure, the unmixed sectional animosity with which an enormous majority of the Northern people regard us of the South. In connection with this, there is another fact, not as generally known as It ought to be, which we propose to lay before the Southern people. The Constitution of the country recognizes slaves as property; the laws of Congress recognize slaves as property; the decisions of the Supreme Court recognize slaves as property; and the constitution, the laws and the court declare that runaway slaves shall be restored to their owners. But how are the Constitution, the laws and the court regarded in nine great Northern States? Let an see. Here is a list of penalties prescribed by certain-Northern Legislatures to such Southerners as venture to make legal endeavors to reclaim their property in those States:
Every one of the above States, when they passed those laws, placed themselves beyond the pale of the Constitution, and virtually dissolved their connection with the Union! Yet no attempts have been made to force them to abide by the laws, and compel them to yield obedience to the stipulations of the general compact. Nothing of the sort. The outraging section appears to enjoy especial immunity; but let the cruelly aggrieved, the wantonly outraged and the causelessly robbed section presume to discuss the necessity of securing their own safety by resorting to their reserved, inalienable rights, and these violators of all laws, constitutions, unions and compacts, lift up their hands in holy horror and say that the Union must be preserved, the Constitution obeyed, and the laws enforced! The Devil can quote Scripture when it suits his infernal purposes; and so do the Black Republicans refer to the Constitution, the Union and the laws, when they contemplate some other scheme of wrong, outrage and spoilation. Thus much to-day, by way of keeping our readers accurately posted. We shall refer to the subject, on proper occasions, hereafter.
|
Back to Causes of the Civil War (Main page)
Back to Editorial
Commentary
Source:
Scan
of the New Orleans Daily Crescent
of November 13, 1860; original
version from: Kenneth
Stampp, Causes of the Civil
War, pp. 46-47.
Date
added to website: May 26, 2000
Updated: August 18, 2026