Southern Policy
Vicksburg Daily
Whig, January 18, 1860
| This is a very interesting editorial.
The name of the paper---Daily Whig---suggests
that it was founded as an organ of the (southern wing of the)
Whig Party. The core policy issue of the Whig Party was the
development of American commercial interests, North and/or South.
The party eventually fractured (over the slavery issue) in the
mid-1850s, with most of the "Northern Whigs" joining the Republican
Party and the "Southern Whigs"---including future C.S. Vice-President
Alexander Stephens---finding homes with the Democrats or as
independants. So it is interesting to find such a "Whigish"
argument being made here with almost zero reference to the slavery
issue, about three months after John Brown's raid at Harpers Ferry. |
By
mere
supineness, the people of
the South have permitted the Yankees to monopolize the carrying trade,
with its
immense profits. We have yielded to them the manufacturing business, in
all its
departments, without an effort, until recently, to become manufacturers
ourselves. We have acquiesced in the claims of the North to do all the
importing, and most of the exporting business, for the whole Union.
Thus, the
North has been agrandised, in a most astonishing degree, at the expense
of the
South. It is no wonder that their villages have grown into magnificent
cities.
It is not strange that they have “merchant princes,” dwelling in
gorgeous
palaces and reveling in luxuries transcending the luxurious appliances
of the
East! How could it be otherwise? New York city, like a mighty queen of
commerce, sits proudly upon her island throne, sparkling in jewels and
waving
an undisputed commercial scepter over the South. By means of her
railways and
navigable streams, she sends out her long arms to the extreme
South;
and, with an avidity rarely equaled, grasps our gains and transfers
them to
herself—taxing us at every step—and depleting us as extensively as
possible
without actually destroying us. Meantime, the South remains passive—in
a state
of torpidity—making cotton bales for the North to manufacture, and
constantly
exerting ourselves to increase the production as much as possible. We
have no
ships in the foreign carrying trade, or very few indeed. No vessels
enter
Southern harbors (comparatively speaking) laden with the rich
“merchandise” of
foreign climes directly imported from those distant countries. We
extend but
little encouragement to the various mechanical arts, but buy most of
our
farming implements from the Northern people. Although Mississippi has
within
her limits an extensive seaboard, affording capacious and secure
harbors,
capable almost of sheltering the shipping of the world, still the blue
waters
of our harbors are unbroken by a single keel, save the diminutive
fishing
smacks which frequent those waters. Although nature hath prepared for
us most
beautiful positions for commercial cities, and pointed, with her
unerring
finger, to the advantages spread before our blind eyes; still,
we have
no seaboard cities, except so far as they exist in imagination, or are
delineated on paper, or are shadowed forth in pompous
resolutions
emanating from disunion conventions! Why is this? Why are we so far
behind in
the great march of improvement? Simply because we have failed to act
in
obedience to the dictates of sound policy. Simply because we have been
almost
criminally neglectful of our own pecuniary interests. What should we
do? What
remedy have we? Why,
in the
first place, let us
withdraw one-third, or even one-half of our capital from agricultural
operations, and invest it in the establishment of manufacturies of
cotton.
Thus, we will greatly reduce the production of the raw material; and,
as a
necessary consequence, greatly enhance the market price of our great
staple.
The business of manufacturing the common cotton fabrics can be as
profitably
conducted here in Mississippi as it can be in Massachusetts. This fact
has been
demonstrated by the humble history of the few manufacturies already
operating
in our State. It has been proven that the business of making cotton
goods in
Mississippi pays from 10 to 12 per cent. profit per annum on the
investment.
Now, suppose we had extensive establishments for producing common
fabrics of
cotton in every county of Mississippi, created by Southern capital, and
owned
and worked by our own people; we could clothe ourselves at a small
expense,
comparatively, and sell the Yankees our surplus cloth, and thus realize
a
profit, instead of buying for ourselves. Consider the enhanced price of
cotton,
consequent upon the reduced supply; calculate the profits of
manufacturing at
home; refer to the opportunity we would thus have of becoming stock
raisers,
and producers of the small grains and fruits which our climate and soil
are
capable of maturing; and who does not see, at a glance, how eminently
advantageous and profitable such a system would be. Connected with this
policy,
let us encourage the mechanical arts. Let us fabricate here all of our
carriages and wagons; all of our farming implements; every article of
furniture
required by our people; and thus secure to ourselves an accession of
valuable
citizens, those multiplied thousands of industrious, honorable, moral
artisans,
who are producers, instead of consumers, and who are valuable, indeed,
to any
community that can secure their presence. Let us sedulously cultivate
the
sentiment, so true in itself, that labor is honorable and dignified.
Lastly,
let us at once begin the business of direct importation and direct
exportation,
and thus keep at home the millions of dollars which we annually pay to
the
North. The business of direct importation and direct exportation would,
of
course, build up, as if by the wand of a magician, splendid Southern
cities of
commercial grandeur and opulence; and thus we might become the most
happy,
prosperous, wealthy and intelligent people upon whom the sun has ever
smiled.
All this we should do—not in spitefulness—not in a spirit of envy—not
with a
view of breaking the ties of national Union—not with a design of
engendering
sectional animosity, but in obedience merely to the dictates of
enlightened
sectional policy, and in obedience to that universal principle, so well
understood and acted upon by our Yankee friends, of consulting our own
pecuniary
interests, and adding to our general and individual pecuniary
emoluments. This
is a
fruitful topic. It
might be spoken of in volumes. We have but glanced at it in the
foregoing
observations. After all, what we have penned, so far from being
original
suggestions, is but the recapitulation of self-evident propositions,
suggesting
themselves to every intelligent mind. It remains to be seen whether the
South
will awake from her ignoble slumber, and act for herself, or whether
she will
indolently remain inactive, and continue to be mere “hewers of wood and
drawers
of water,” for the merchant princes of the North. |
Back to Causes of the Civil War (Main page) Back to Editorial Commentary Source:
Dumond, Southern Editorials on
Secession, pp. 13--16; image scan of original newspaper document
(page 2) available on newspapers.com.
Date added to website: August 20, 2026 |